Flat-fee legal representation for visual artists, photographers, illustrators, and gallery-represented creative professionals. Gallery representation agreements, commission contracts, image licensing, print sales, model and location releases, IP protection, and the contract infrastructure of working artist careers.
Average quote turnaround: under 1 hour · Free consultation, no obligation
Working visual artists and photographers operate small creative businesses that intersect with art-market conventions, intellectual property law, and contract law in industry-specific ways. The legal infrastructure spans several recurring categories: gallery representation (the contractual relationship with a gallery that represents and sells the artist's work), commissioned work (custom pieces created for specific clients), image licensing (granting rights to use existing images for specific purposes), print sales and reproduction (limited editions, prints, merchandise), and the foundational IP protections (copyright registration, model releases, location releases) that prevent later disputes.
The market is also genuinely underserved by transactional legal work. Most visual artists and photographers either work without legal review (signing whatever the gallery or client puts in front of them) or rely on art-organization template agreements that don't address their specific situation. Professional working artists often discover decades into their careers that they signed away rights or revenue streams they didn't need to give up — gallery contracts that claim ongoing commissions on artist-sourced sales, licensing deals that grant broader rights than the licensee actually paid for, commission contracts that don't address what happens to the artist's preliminary work product if the commissioner cancels.
Most of our visual artist and photographer clients come to us with one of a few specific needs: reviewing a gallery representation agreement before signing, drafting a commission contract for a major project, addressing image licensing for editorial or commercial use of an existing photograph or artwork, structuring print or limited-edition sales, registering copyrights in major bodies of work, or addressing a specific IP issue (someone using their work without permission, a dispute over commissioned work). The work matches our flat-fee model and serves a genuinely underserved market.
Gallery agreements govern the artist's relationship with a gallery that represents and sells their work. Key terms: the term of the relationship, exclusivity (whether the gallery has exclusive rights in defined territories, or non-exclusive rights), commission split on sales (typically 40-60% to the gallery, varying substantially by gallery and artist career stage), what work is covered (existing inventory, future work, work created during the relationship), promotion and marketing commitments, gallery exhibition obligations, advance and stipend structures (some galleries advance against future sales), termination rights and post-termination obligations (does the gallery continue earning commissions on artist-sourced sales after the relationship ends?), and ownership of unsold inventory and rights to images for the gallery's marketing. Standard galleries have their own form agreements that range from reasonable to heavily one-sided. We review these carefully before signing.
Commissioned work — for individual collectors, corporate clients, public art commissions, advertising work — needs a written agreement covering scope (what specifically is being created), timeline, payment structure (typically deposit plus milestones plus delivery), creative approval rights (how much input the commissioner has, how revisions are handled), ownership of preliminary work (sketches, drafts, alternative versions), what happens if the commissioner cancels (kill fee structures), and rights to the finished work (does the commissioner own copyright, or is it licensed for specific use). Commission disputes most often arise from gaps in these provisions — addressing them upfront prevents most disputes.
Licensing existing images and artworks for editorial use, commercial use, advertising, merchandise, and other purposes is a core revenue stream for many photographers and artists. License terms cover the specific use authorized (what type of media, for what purpose), the term, the territory, the rights granted (exclusive vs. non-exclusive), the fee structure (flat fee, royalty, hybrid), credit and attribution requirements, and how rights revert at the end of the term. We draft licensing agreements for outgoing licenses (the artist licensing their work to someone) and review incoming license agreements (the artist receiving an offer for their work). More on licensing agreements →
Print sales — fine art prints, limited editions, photography editions — involve specific industry conventions and legal requirements. Limited edition prints have specific NY law requirements about disclosure of edition size, the artist's involvement in production, and material disclosures. We draft print and edition agreements that comply with these requirements and protect both the artist and the buyer.
Photographs of identifiable people, particularly used commercially, require model releases — written authorization from the people photographed. Photographs of identifiable private property used commercially may require location releases. Without proper releases, commercial use can create right-of-publicity claims (unauthorized use of a person's identity) and trespass-related claims. We draft template releases for ongoing photography work and address specific releases for high-value or high-risk uses.
Copyright in original works arises automatically; registration with the U.S. Copyright Office adds enforcement options that aren't available without registration. For visual artists and photographers, registration matters most for substantial bodies of work or specific high-value pieces. Registration before infringement (or within three months of first publication) preserves the right to seek statutory damages and attorney's fees in infringement litigation — without registration, the only remedy is actual damages, which are often modest and not worth the cost of pursuing.
Unauthorized use of artwork or photography happens regularly — images scraped from the internet for commercial use, work used in advertising without permission, works copied or imitated. Enforcement options include cease-and-desist letters, DMCA takedown notices for online use, and (for substantial cases) infringement litigation. Most cases resolve through cease-and-desist or takedown without litigation. We handle enforcement work for clients but coordinate with litigation specialists for cases that require contested litigation.
Established artists with substantial bodies of work need legacy planning that addresses how the work is managed after their death — who controls the copyright, who handles licensing, what happens to unsold inventory, how the artist's reputation and legacy are managed. This intersects with estate planning and is typically handled in coordination with estate counsel; we address the IP-side considerations that many estate plans miss.
All work is flat-fee, set in writing before any work begins. Pricing scales with project complexity: gallery agreement reviews and standard licensing agreements price modestly; copyright registration projects, complex commission agreements, and multi-piece licensing arrangements price higher.
For working artists with regular commission work or licensing activity, we sometimes structure ongoing relationships with predictable pricing for routine work (commissions, licensing) and project pricing for larger items.
Get a free quote in under an hour by submitting the contact form.
"Tatiana was amazing from the very beginning. Truly one of a kind experience."
Several key areas: the commission rate (the gallery's share of sales — typically 40-60%, with the higher end common for newer artists), exclusivity scope (does the gallery have exclusive rights in defined territories, all media, or only specific contexts), what work is covered (just the work the gallery is showing, or all your future work during the relationship), termination provisions (how either side can end the relationship and what continuing rights the gallery has after termination), and post-termination commissions (does the gallery continue earning on artist-sourced sales after you leave). The commission rate is the most-discussed term but the structural provisions often have larger long-term financial impact.
Scope (what specifically is being created — including dimensions, materials, timeline expectations), payment structure (deposit at signing, milestone payments, balance at delivery — typically 30-40% deposit, balance distributed across milestones), creative approval (how much input the commissioner has, how revisions are handled, what counts as material vs. minor changes), kill fee structure (what the commissioner pays if they cancel, accounting for the artist's time invested), ownership of preliminary materials (sketches, drafts, alternative versions remain the artist's), and rights to the finished work (typically the commissioner owns the physical work but the artist retains copyright unless specifically assigned).
For substantial bodies of work or high-value individual pieces. Registration before infringement (or within three months of first publication) is required to seek statutory damages and attorney's fees in litigation. Without registration, the only remedy in an infringement suit is actual damages, which are often modest and not worth pursuing. The registration cost is small relative to the protection — particularly for photographers, who can register many images at once as a group registration. We handle group registrations for photographers with substantial portfolios and individual registrations for high-value works.
For commercial use of identifiable people, yes. The right of publicity protects people from unauthorized commercial use of their identity, and using identifiable images without releases creates legal exposure. Editorial use (news, journalism, art for its own sake) has more latitude under First Amendment principles, but the line between editorial and commercial is sometimes contested. Best practice for professional photographers: have releases ready, get them signed for any image that might end up in commercial use, and maintain organized records connecting releases to specific images.
Several options. DMCA takedown notices for online use can remove the work from many platforms quickly without litigation — most platforms (Instagram, Facebook, websites) honor properly-formatted takedown notices. Cease-and-desist letters for direct unauthorized use often resolve the issue without further escalation. For substantial commercial uses without permission, infringement litigation is available, particularly if the work is registered with the Copyright Office (which preserves statutory damages). We handle takedown notices and cease-and-desist letters and coordinate with litigation specialists for cases that require contested enforcement.
Flat fee set in writing before any work begins. Pricing scales with complexity. Get a free quote in under an hour by submitting the contact form.
Free 20-minute consultation. Quote in under an hour. No obligation.
Get your free quote →